Universities and journalistic content
November 17th, 2009The new question for journalism schools seems to be whether they can and will provide content for newspapers in trouble.
The Chronicle of Higher Education this week has published a number of articles on journalism, focusing on whether journalism schools should or can play a new role in providing content to mainstream media. These include “University-based reporting could keep journalism alive” by Columbia Professor Michael Schudson and former Washington Post Editor Leonard Downie. The article is an extension of their recent report, “The Reconstruction of American Journalism.” Also showcased is an article by Nicholas Lemann, which unfortunately can only be accessed if you have a subscription to the Chronicle. Perhaps it will appear later on Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism Web site, where Lemann is dean.
Two primary issues need to be addressed. One is defining appropriate content production by journalism schools, and the second is evaluating whether the decline of newspapers represents the death of journalism or the death of a particular model of journalism.
Many journalism schools are providing content using a variety of models. This is a major point of discussion among the deans of the 12 schools involved in the Carnegie-Knight Initiative on the Future of Journalism Education. The University of North Carolina School of Journalism and Mass Communication provides content for newspapers, television stations and cable channels in the state and elsewhere. The model here has been for instructors and students to shape content based on classroom work and particular goals of individual classes, and then provide that material in an open access environment. As examples, our student newscast and many other projects are carried by Time Warner cable, photo stories have been carried by CBS television station WRAL’s Web site and the Charlotte Observer, and other newspapers across the state have carried stories with particular interest in their locales. This approach has enabled professors to determine the approach and guide the students rather than having media outlets determine what the students produce. We believe the approach contributes to an open environment and allows professors and students to experiment and to contribute to the intellectual life of the university through research and development.
This fall we will open a new digital newsroom that will experiment with student work and niche audiences, incorporating research into the project. The school will create a grant system for professors wanting to do research that will benefit media industries as we move forward in the midst of the media revolution.
Journalism schools should not forget that media outlets long expected journalism schools to produce a relatively cheap labor force, even when profits were as high as 30 percent. They also should not forget that universities in the past sometimes shunned schools of journalism because they were deemed to be trade schools. Journalism schools in this era need to be looking forward - doing the research and development needed to move through the current media revolution and into the mid-21st century of journalism. Producing content to create innovation, explore the future and train students is a worthy goal. Producing content to save newspapers could become a means of providing cheap labor to a failing industry.
We are proud of our relationship with the North Carolina Press Association and the North Carolina Association of Broadcasters. We have developed many projects with them, ranging from a media law and policy center colloquium to a Latino project that produced stories and multimedia carried by many media outlets. But the media outlets in North Carolina do not expect the School of Journalism and Mass Communication to become their content producer. We work jointly to assess the future of the industry, to experiment with content and to test various business models.
The second point - the evolution of journalism across time - also is important. It is a mistake to assume that the modern commercial newspaper with an emphasis on objectivity is the form that has existed since the beginning of the country. During the formation of the country, editors were highly involved with politicians, and although some journalism historians have enjoyed characterizing that period as “The Dark Ages of American Journalism,” in truth it represented an alliance between politicians and journalists designed to build a country based on a two-party system.
The latter 19th century was characterized by strong personal journalists - editors who had a point of view and unabashedly strived to build their communities. The examples are many, including Henry Grady of Atlanta and Henry Watterson of Louisville who trumpeted the New South, and William Allen White who was considered the spokesperson for the Great Plains.
One could argue that the beginning of the decline started with the emergence of the modern objective newspaper, through which editors and corporate owners disengaged themselves from their communities.
Journalism is important to democracy but the newspapers in serious trouble because of heavy debt and corporate expansion may not be the form for the future.
Journalism schools should partner with media to experiment and innovate, not to preserve the past.

Today, I announced an incredible act of generosity that will fund a transformative initiative in the UNC School of Journalism and Mass Communication for our students and our faculty – and we believe for the journalism and media professions.
Tom Bowers’ book, Making News, hit newsstands last week. It is for sale at the Bull’s Head Bookshop on campus or from